Can you hear what I am not saying:
What is love? Is love the affection of closeness or is it the fullness of emptiness? Can affection be deemed acceptance or pity--or is it emptiness that manifest cognitive reactions to probability? For whatever reason, if closeness is the absence of aloneness, than emptiness has to be the presence of space.
Can you understand what is not said:
What is loyalty? Could it be the deserving quality of an influence or is it simply a desirable attachment? Because, if the desirable attachment detoxicate the deserving quality of the influence; is it still considered loyalty?
Please, listen to what I am trying to understand:
What is pain? Is it simply a matter in production or a violation in perception? Does sensory indulge in confusion or does sensory heighten vulnerability?
Just focus on what I am not saying:
What is sadness? Can it be deemed solitude or too even? Because, if solitude supersede action and too even is the value of acceptance, than sadness clearly has to be a single denomination.
Have you figured out what I am not saying:
What is a promise? Is it objective or subjective? Because of the nature of a broken promise, could it be imagine just as the wind blows, or is it possible that seriousness has to be the primary motivator.
Is it really hard to hear what I am not saying:
What is endurance? Could it simply be strength evolved in character or does the complexity extend far beyond failure? Because if nature is the protagonist, endurance would be non-existent, but if endurance is the extension of failure, than endurance certainly is deemed primary.
Think about what I am not saying:
What is happiness? Could it be an optical illusion produced by emotions, or is it a judgment of a tangible situation? However, if it is a judgment of a tangible situation, happiness would reach infinity. But, if it’s just an optical illusion produced by emotions, than true happiness is a non-existent product of emotions.
Understand that these words are neither of confusion nor conflict. They simply are written to strengthen the mind’s perception of detail. These words should motion emotions to critical thinking of the reality that encompasses us.
|